Skip to main content

Table 1 a and b: Characteristics of general practice clinics and patients not receiving oral anticoagulant treatment

From: Reasons for omitting anticoagulant treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation: an audit of patient records in general practice

a: Clinics

Audit (n = 12)

Reference (n = 325)

P-value*

List size - n (%)

<2,000 patients

2 (16.7)

96 (29.6)

0.399

2–4,000 patients

3 (25.0)

101 (31.1)

 

>4,000 patients

7 (58.3)

128 (39.4)

 

GPs in clinic - n (%)

1

2 (16.7)

98 (30.2)

0.544

2

3 (25.0)

83 (25.6)

 

≥3

7 (58.3)

144 (44.3)

 

GP age (years)

Mean (sd)

48.8 (7.7)

50.0 (10.3)

0.472

GP sex– n (%)

Female

23 (59.0)

479 (59.2)

0.977

Number of patients per GP

Mean (sd)

1,587 (197)

1,582 (322)

0.962

Number of AF patients per GP

Mean (sd)

51.4 (25.5)

48.8 (24.0)

0.708

AF patients– n (%)

OAC treatment

1,208 (86.1)

25,774 (86.6)

0.596

No OAC treatment

195 (13.9)

3,990 (13.4)

 

b: Patients

Audit (n = 195)

Reference (n = 3, 990)

P-value*

Age (years)

Mean (sd)

64.5 (15.4)

64.2 (15.0)

0.802

Sex– n (%)

Female

66 (33.9)

1,339 (33.6)

0.934

Time since AF diagnosis (years)

Mean (sd)

5.9 (3.9)

5.5 (4.0)

0.224

CHA₂DS₂-VASc score**– n (%)

0

86 (44.1)

1,753 (43.9)

0.735

1

28 (14.4)

668 (16.7)

 

≥2

70 (35.9)

1,315 (33.0)

 

Unspecified

11 (5.6)

254 (6.4)

 

HAS-BLED score**– n (%)

0

63 (32.3)

1,237 (31.0)

0.684

1

45 (23.1)

1,057 (26.5)

 

≥2

76 (39.0)

1,442 (36.1)

 

Unspecified

11 (5.6)

254 (6.4)

 

Charlson Comorbidity Index**– n (%)

0

110 (56.4)

2,413 (60.5)

0.651

1–2

59 (30.3)

1,129 (28.3)

 

3–4

18 (9.2)

295 (7.4)

 

≥5

8 (4.1)

153 (3.8)

 
  1. Abbreviations AF: atrial fibrillation; OAC: oral anticoagulant; GP: general practitioner; sd: standard deviation
  2. Notes Table 1a describes the general practice clinics in the audit sample compared to all general practice clinics in the Central Denmark Region (reference), including AF combined with no OAC treatment in the audit sample compared to all AF patients receiving no OAC treatment in the Central Denmark Region (reference). Table 1b describes the patient characteristics in the audit sample compared to all untreated patients in the Cental Denmark region. Data presented are based on information obtained from the Danish Atrial Fibrillation Registry
  3. *To assess differences between the groups, chi-square tests were applied to compare categorical variables and two-sample t-test continuous variables
  4. ** Based on patient history on 1 January 2023