Skip to main content

Table 2 Reasons, benefits and barriers to referral provided by general practitioners according to referral frequency

From: Referral reasons of type 2 diabetes patients from general practitioners to diabetes specialists: a cross-sectional observational study

Reasons, benefits and barriers according to referral frequency

Overall (n = 325)

Infrequent referrals

(n = 246)

Frequent

referrals

(n = 79)

P-value

 

Reasons for referral

     

Diagnosis of diabetes

34 (10)

22 (8.9)

12 (15.2)

0.11

 

Diabetes imbalance

251 (77)

182 (74)

69 (87)

0.01

 

To start insulin therapy

175 (54)

119 (48)

56 (71)

< 0.001

 

Initiation/reassessment/change of treatment

116 (36)

85 (35)

31 (39)

0.45

 

To consolidate communication about therapeutics and compliance

71 (22)

47 (19)

24 (30)

0.04

 

Complications of diabetes

122 (38)

93 (38)

29 (37)

0.86

 

Therapeutic education

58 (18)

44 (18)

14 (18)

0.97

 

Nutritional management

49 (15)

33 (13)

16 (20)

0.14

 

To facilitate access to complementary examinations

28 (8.6)

20 (8.1)

8 (10)

0.58

 

Other reasons

12 (3.7)

9 (3.7)

3 (3.8)

0.96

 

Benefits expected from referral

     

To support therapeutic communication

131 (40)

95 (39)

36 (46)

0.27

 

To get another perspective on the management of the patient

206 (63)

151 (61)

55 (70)

0.19

 

To obtain advice before using new medication, such as SGLT-2 inhibitors(Gliflozins)

154 (47)

104 (42)

50 (63)

0.001

 

To enable close monitoring by a multidisciplinary team (e.g. registered nurse, psychologist, dietician)

93 (29)

64 (26)

29 (37)

0.07

 

Therapeutic education

115 (35)

86 (35)

29 (37)

0.78

 

To facilitate the obtention of a complete check-up (carried out during a daytime or weekday hospitalization)

141 (43)

105 (43)

36 (46)

0.65

 

Other benefits

21 (6.5)

18 (7.3)

3 (3.8)

0.27

 

No benefits expected from referral

1 (0.3)

1 (0.4)

0 (0.0)

1.00

 

Barriers to referral

     

Excessive wait time

184 (57)

138 (56)

46 (58)

0.74

 

Distance

44 (14)

34 (14)

10 (13)

0.79

 

Difficulties in communication with the diabetes specialist (e.g., telephone, absence of medical report)

50 (15)

38 (15)

12 (15)

0.96

 

Disagreement/professional disagreement

12 (3.7)

10 (4.1)

2 (2.5)

0.53

 

Patient refusal

145 (45)

99 (40)

46 (58)

0.01

 

Fear of losing the patient

7 (2.2)

6 (2.4)

1 (1.3)

1.00

 

Doubts about the added value of diabetologists compared to general practitioners

69 (21)

64 (26)

5 (6.3)

< 0.001

 

Out-of-pocket fees applied by sector 2 (unregulated) practitionersa

57 (18)

44 (18)

13 (16)

0.77

 

Other barriers

23 (7.1)

22 (8.9)

1 (1.3)

0.021

 

No barrier

35 (11)

26 (11)

9 (11)

0.84

 
  1. Table legend: Reasons, benefits and barriers are provided as numbers of positive responses with the associated percentage. Frequent referrals: more than one in ten patients in the last year. Infrequent referrals: no referrals or only one in ten patients in the last year
  2. Table footnotes: a French GPs have the option to be payed directly by the national health insurance, in which case their consultations fees are set to a fixed amount (sector 1), or instead they can choose to determine their own fees and be paid directly by the patient (sector 2). Sector 2 physicians are required to have held senior positions in hospitals before they open their practice. Sector 2 physicians typically apply higher fees